Academic Studies
“A pneumatic muscle hand therapy device”
The development of a pneumatic muscle driven hand therapy device, the Mentor trade mark, reinforces the need for volitional activation
of joint movement while concurrently offering knowledge of results about range of motion, muscle activity or resistance to movement.
Koeneman et al. 2004
“Design of a robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy device.”
The development of a pneumatic muscle (PM) driven therapeutic device, the RUPERT™, has the potential of providing a low cost and
safe take-home method of supplementing therapy in addition to in the clinic treatment.
Koeneman et al. 2005
“Home-based robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation for chronic stroke survivors.”
This study provides preliminary evidence that home-based rehabilitation provided by the Foot Mentor is a viable alternative for the treatment of distal lower extremity dysfunction in chronic stroke survivors.
Lynskey et al. 2014
“Increasing Access to Cost Effective Home-Based Rehabilitation for Rural Veteran Stroke Survivors”
Home-based, robotic therapy provided by the Hand Mentor reduced costs (65%), while expanding access to a rehabilitation modality for people who would not otherwise have received care. Those who participated made clinically meaningful improvements in the use of their impaired extremities using a robotic device in the home.
Housley et al. 2016
“Expanding stroke telerehabilitation services to rural veterans: qualitative study on patient experiences using the robotic stroke therapy delivery and monitoring system program”
The Hand Mentor provides a valuable rehabilitation option for extending current treatment or maintaining rehabilitation when benefits are exhausted.
Cherry et al. 2015
Academic Studies
“Increasing Access to Cost Effective Home-Based Rehabilitation for Rural Veteran Stroke Survivors”
Home-based, robotic therapy provided by the Hand Mentor reduced costs (65%), while expanding access to a rehabilitation modality for people who would not otherwise have received care. Those who participated made clinically meaningful improvements in the use of their impaired extremities using a robotic device in the home.
Housley et al. 2016
“Home-based robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation for chronic stroke survivors.”
This study provides preliminary evidence that home-based rehabilitation provided by the Foot Mentor is a viable alternative for the treatment of distal lower extremity dysfunction in chronic stroke survivors.
Lynskey et al. 2014
“Expanding stroke telerehabilitation services to rural veterans: qualitative study on patient experiences using the robotic stroke therapy delivery and monitoring system program”
The Hand Mentor provides a valuable rehabilitation option for extending current treatment or maintaining rehabilitation when benefits are exhausted.
Cherry et al. 2015
Is Motus Home Right for Me?
Find out if you can increase and speed up your recovery by taking our Motus Assessment
Clinical Partners
Clinical Partners
Are you getting enough therapy to regain function?
Regaining function requires 400-600 repetitions daily.
Nudo, et al. 1996
Average dose completed in traditional outpatient therapy is
53 Repetitions.
Lang, et al. 2009
Motus users average dose per therapy session was
159 Repetitions.
Housley, et al. 2016 *
Compared to average insured outpatient rehab, cost is
same price for 3x.
the effective dose.
The only FDA Class 1 at-home
stroke rehab device with
active assistance
in the world.
*Repetition is activity dependent and is defined as either
two or three sign changes of velocity in movement.
Limited therapy hours is a primary reason stroke recovery takes a long time.
Let’s get to recovery faster by boosting your hours of rehab.
